Commentary for Zevachim 133:3
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> תניא אמר לו ר"א לרבי יהושע אשם ששחטו בצפון לשם שלמים יוכיח ששינה את שמו ומועלין בו ואף אתה אל תתמה על העולה שאע"פ ששינה את שמה שימעלו בה
WILL YOU SAY THE SAME OF A BURNT-OFFERING, WHERE HE CHANGED ITS NAME TO SOMETHING THAT IS ALTOGETHER PERMITTED?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' No part of a bird sin-offering is forbidden.');"><sup>4</sup></span> <big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>It was taught: R'Eliezer said to R'Joshua: Let a guilt-offering slaughtered in the north as a peace-offering prove it; though he changed its name, it involves trespass.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rashi: before the sprinkling of the blood, but not after, for then it is eaten by priests. Tosaf.: even after the sprinkling, as R. Eliezer holds that a guilt-offering slaughtered under a different designation is unfit and may not be eaten (supra 2a) .');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Zevachim 133:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.