Commentary for Zevachim 163:5

והא לא דמיא אלא לתלמיד שמזג לרבו בין בחמין בין בצונן אמר לו אל תמזוג לי אלא חמין

MISHNAH. IF THE BLOOD OF A SIN-OFFERING WAS RECEIVED IN TWO GOBLETS AND ONE OF THEM WENT WITHOUT, THE INSIDE ONE IS FIT. IF ONE OF THEM ENTERED WITHIN, R. JOSE THE GALILEAN DECLARES THE OUTER ONE FIT; BUT THE SAGES DISQUALIFY IT. SAID R. JOSE THE GALILEAN: IF THE PLACE WHERE AN INTENTION [DIRECTED TO IT] DISQUALIFIES, [VIZ.,] WITHOUT, YOU DO NOT TREAT WHAT IS LEFT AS WHAT WENT OUT; THEN THE PLACE WHERE AN INTENTION [DIRECTED TO IT] DOES NOT DISQUALIFY, [VIZ.,] WITHIN, IS IT NOT LOGICAL THAT WE DO NOT TREAT WHAT IS LEFT AS WHAT ENTERED WITHIN? IF IT ENTERED WITHIN TO MAKE ATONEMENT, EVEN IF HE [THE PRIEST] DID NOT MAKE ATONEMENT, IT IS UNFIT: THESE ARE THE WORDS OF R. ELIEZER. R. SIMEON SAID: [IT IS NOT UNFIT] UNLESS HE MAKES ATONEMENT. R. JUDAH SAID: IF HE TOOK IT IN UNWITTINGLY, IT IS FIT. FOR ALL UNFIT BLOOD WHICH WAS PRESENTED AT THE ALTAR [I.E., SPRINKLED] THE HEADPLATE DOES NOT PROPITIATE, SAVE FOR UNCLEAN [BLOOD]. FOR THE HEADPLATE PROPITIATES FOR THAT WHICH IS UNCLEAN, BUT DOES NOT PROPITIATE FOR WHAT GOES OUT. <br>

Explore commentary for Zevachim 163:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.