Commentary for Zevachim 181:13

דלמא שלמים דאמש וחטאת ואשם דיום היכי משכחת לה דשחטינהו לתרוייהו אבל לא שחטינהו לתרוייהו תיבעי לך

if he slaughtered the peace-offering first - [the sprinkling of] the sin-offering and the guilt-offering would take precedence!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Huna understands the Mishnah thus: If a peace-offering was brought yesterday but only killed to-day, while a sin-offering or a guilt-offering brought to-day is still waiting to be slaughtered, the blood of the peace-offering must be sprinkled before the other is slaughtered. For he holds that if the peace-offering too has yet to be slaughtered, the Mishnah would not rule that it takes precedence. Hence by inference, if both were brought to-day and the peace-offering was wrongly slaughtered first, the slaughtering of the sin-offering etc. must precede the sprinkling of the peace-offering. This proves that where one sacrifice is more sacred than another, and the latter was slaughtered first, the former must nevertheless be slaughtered, and its blood sprinkled, before that of the less sacred is sprinkled, and presumably the same applies where one sacrifice is more constant than the other.');">¹⁸</span> - [No:] perhaps how [is the case of] a peace-offering of yesterday and a sin-offering and a guilt-offering of to-day meant?

Explore commentary for Zevachim 181:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.