Commentary for Zevachim 213:14

ורבי עקיבא אמר לך ההוא מיבעי ליה על השוחט הוא חייב ולא על המולק ור' ישמעאל נפקא ליה מזה הדבר

- He infers it from [the phrase] 'to sacrifice it'. And R'Ishmael? - One ['it'] is in respect of those [sacrifices] which which should be burnt within, which were made incomplete and offered up without; the other is in respect of those which should be burnt without, which one made incomplete and offered up without.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If 'it' were written once only, I would say that its implication applies only to those which should be burnt without. But as for those which should be burnt within, he is culpable even if he offers up only part, for when a single limb springs off the altar during the burning (haktarah) , it must be replaced, which shews that haktarah applies even to part. (The general principle is that the performance of a rite without involves liability when it would count as a proper rite within.)');">²²</span>

Explore commentary for Zevachim 213:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.