Commentary for Zevachim 22:18
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> אמר רבי אלעזר אמר רבי אושעיא מכשיר היה בן בתירא בפסח ששחטו שחרית בארבעה עשר לשמו דכוליה יומא זימניה הוא
R'Zera asked: Are they valid yet do not propitiate, and so he disagrees in one only; or are they valid and propitiate, and he disagrees in both?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Does Simeon the brother of Azariah mean that when slaughtered in the name of a higher sacrifice they are fit, yet do not propitiate, i.e., they do not acquit their owner of their obligation; but if slaughtered in the name of a lower sacrifice they are completely unfit? In that case he agrees with the first Tanna as far as the former instance is concerned, and disagrees only in respect of the latter. Or does he mean in the former instance that they also propitiate? If so, he disagrees with the first Tanna in respect of the former too, the first Tanna holding that they do not propitiate.');"><sup>9</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Zevachim 22:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.