Commentary for Zevachim 220:3
דתניא רבי אלעזר ורבי שמעון אומרים ממקום שפסק הוא מתחיל:
<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Raba said: R'Eleazar too agrees in the case of blood.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He accepts the view in the Mishnah, though he disagrees in the case of frankincense.');"><sup>3</sup></span> For we learnt: R'Eleazar and R'Simeon maintained: From where he left off, there he recommences.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 42a. If the blood is accidentally spilt after the first application, a second animal is slaughtered, and the sprinkling is continued, starting with the second application. Thus the first application was effective, and therefore if it is made without, it entails liability.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Zevachim 220:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.