Commentary for Zevachim 228:3
רב נחמן בר יצחק אמר פנים דגלגל לגבי שילה כחוץ דמי
R'Nahman B'Isaac said: Within, at Gilgal, was like without in comparison with Shiloh.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It counts as without since obligatory sacrifices might not be offered there. Thus even R. Simeon admits that he is not flagellated, for now we find the negative injunction only in connection with slaughtering without, but not in connection with slaughtering within.');"><sup>5</sup></span> Rabbah said: R'Simeon's reason is as it was taught: R'Simeon said: How do we know that one who sacrifices his Passover-offering at a private bamah when bamoth were prohibited, violates a negative command?
Explore commentary for Zevachim 228:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.