Commentary for Zevachim 233:10

וחכ"א כל שהצבור מקריבין באהל מועד שבמדבר מקריבין באהל מועד שבגלגל וכאן וכאן לא קרבו יחיד אלא עולה ושלמים בלבד ר' שמעון אומר אף צבור לא הקריבו אלא פסחים

were offered in the Tent of Meeting at Gilgal.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which was a public bamah.');">¹⁹</span> What was the difference between the Tent of Meeting in the wilderness and the Tent of Meeting at Gilgal? [When] the Tent of Meeting in the wilderness [existed], bamoth were not permitted; [when] the Tent of Meeting at Gilgal [existed], bamoth were permitted, and one could offer on his bamah on the top of his roof<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., at a private bamah.');">²⁰</span> only burnt-offering[s] and peace-offerings. But the Sages maintain: whatever the community offered in the Tent of Meeting in the wilderness they offered in the Tent of Meeting at Gilgal. In both places<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. both at public and at private bamoth.');">²¹</span> only burnt-offering[s] and peace-offerings were offered on behalf of a private individual. R'Simeon said: Even the community offered only Passover-offerings

Explore commentary for Zevachim 233:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.