Commentary for Zevachim 60:2

ולא פליגי והא מיפלג פליגי א"ל פליגי במאי דפליגי ולא פליגי במאי דלא פליגי

For R'Isaac B'Joseph said in R'Johanan's name: All agree that if he declared 'Let this [sanctity] fall upon the animal and after that let that [sanctity] fall upon it,' [the latter] does not fall upon it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If he declared, 'Let the sanctity of this animal, dedicated for a burnt-offering, fall upon this one as its substitute, and then let the sanctity of the other dedicated for a peace-offerings fall upon it', it is not seized with the sanctity of the second, for sanctity cannot fall upon an animal which already possesses it.');">³</span> 'Let this [sanctity] not fall upon it unless the other falls upon it [too],' all agree that [the latter] does not fall upon it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he obviously intended the animal to assume both sanctities simultaneously.');">⁴</span> They disagree only where he declares, '[Let this animal be] a substitute for a burnt-offering, a substitute for peace-offering.'

Explore commentary for Zevachim 60:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.