Commentary for Zevachim 72:17

לפיכך אם נתן את הראשונה כתיקנה ואת השניה חוץ לזמנה כיפר

R'Hisda said: R'Dimi B'Hinena was wont to say: One is liable for uncleanness in respect of unroast flesh of a Passover-offering and loaves of a thanks-offering of which no separation [for the priest] was made.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A thanks-offering was accompanied by forty loaves, four of which were taken off for the priest. Before that was done, the loaves might not be eaten; similarly, a Passover-offering might be eaten roast only. Nevertheless, an unclean person who partakes of them is liable on account of his defilement, though they could not be eaten even by a clean person.');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Zevachim 72:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.