Commentary for Zevachim 83:2

קתני מיהא פיגל בין בראשונה בין בשניה בין בשלישית ופליג

To this R. Ashi demurred: Does he then teach [that] he was silent? Rather said R. Ashi: The circumstances here are e.g., that he declared a piggul intention at the first, second, and third. You might argue, If you think that whatever one does, one does with the first intention, why must he repeat his piggul declaration at each one? Therefore he informs us [that we do not argue so].

Explore commentary for Zevachim 83:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.