Commentary for Zevachim 97:5
הרי פסח דהוא אינו טעון סמיכה ונסכים ותנופת חזה ושוק ואילו מותר דידיה טעון סמיכה ונסכים ותנופת חזה ושוק
Yet there is the case of a substitute: whereas [sacrificial] sanctity does not fall upon an animal with a permanent blemish, it [substitution] does fall upon an animal with a permanent blemish?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If a man dedicates a blemished animal for a sacrifice, it merely receives monetary sanctity, and can be redeemed, whereupon it becomes hullin');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Zevachim 97:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.