Ein%20mishpat for Eruvin 189:15

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> אמר רבה לא תימא היינו טעמא דרבי יהודה משום דקא סבר ב' מחיצות דאורייתא אלא משום דקסבר פי תקרה יורד וסותם

in which a breach was made towards a karmelith<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The movement of objects from a karmelith into another domain or from the latter into the former is only Rabbinically forbidden. As no Pentateuchal law would he infringed, even if an object were carried from the courtyard into the karmelith or vice versa, Samuel adopted the lenient rule of R. Judah in a case where the courtyard was a permitted domain when the Sabbath began.');">³³</span> while the other<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That in the case of partitions the halachah is in agreement with R. Judah.');">³⁴</span> referred to one in which a breach was made towards a public domain.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where (cf. supra n. 9) a Pentateuchal law might be infringed.');">³⁵</span>

Explore ein%20mishpat for Eruvin 189:15. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.