Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Halakhah for Eruvin 127:1

אם כן ביטלת תורת עירוב מאותו מבוי

If so,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That renunciation alone is deemed to be sufficient to enable the residents to enjoy the privileges mentioned.');"><sup>1</sup></span> are you not abolishing the law of 'erub in that alley? ' - 'They might prepare an 'erub'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Although it would bring them no material benefit.');"><sup>2</sup></span> 'Would It not then be said that an 'erub is effective even where a heathen is a resident in the place? ' - 'An announcement might be made'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the 'erub is ineffective, that with the exception of the one resident, in whose favour the others had renounced their rights, all are forbidden to carry any objects from their houses into the alley and vice versa, and that only within the alley, which on account of the renunciation assumed the status of a private domain, is the movement of objects permitted.');"><sup>3</sup></span>

Explore halakhah for Eruvin 127:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Full ChapterNext Verse