Jewish%20thought for Gittin 146:5
כדברי הכל
If he [afterwards] gave her money, they suspect that it was on account of fornication, as we say that he gave it her for her hire; but we do not suspect it was for betrothal. R. Jose son of R. Judah, however, says that in this case also we have to suspect that it may have been for betrothal. On which of these views can we justify the statement made by Rabbah b. Bar Hanah in the name of R. Johanan: 'The difference<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Between Beth Hillel and Beth Shammai, infra 81a. If a man has divorced his wife and she stays in the same inn with him, Beth Hillel require him to give her a second Get, but Beth Shammai do not. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore jewish%20thought for Gittin 146:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.