Jewish%20thought for Shabbat 194:7
לא ס"ד דתניא רבי יהודה מוסיף אף השובט והמדקדק אמרו לו שובט הרי הוא בכלל מיסך מדקדק הרי הוא בכלל אורג מאי לאו דעבדינהו לתרווייהו בהדי הדדי וש"מ מחייב היה רבי יהודה אתולדה במקום אב
Does that not mean that one performs both of them together. which proves that R. Judah imposed liability for a derivative [performed] simultaneously with its principal — Why so? perhaps it really means that each was performed separately. R. Judah not imposing liability for a derivative [performed] simultaneously with its principal, and they differ in this: R. Judah holds.These are principal labours; while the Rabbis hold, These are derivatives. The proof [of this assumption] is that it is stated, 'R. Judah adds etc.': now. it is well if you agree that they are principal labours [on his view, for then] what does he add? he adds principals; but if you say that they are derivatives, what does he add?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For only principals are enumerated there. ');"><sup>7</sup></span>
Explore jewish%20thought for Shabbat 194:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.