Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 110:3
הניחה בחמה או שמסרה לחרש שוטה וקטן ויצאה והזיקה חייב
BUT IF THE OWNER HAD LEFT THEM IN A SUNNY PLACE, OR HE HAD HANDED A MINOR, AND THEY GOT AWAY AND DID DAMAGE, HE HANDED THEM OVER TO THE CARE OF A DEAF-MUTE, AN IDIOT, HE WOULD BE LIABLE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Done by the sheep, since they have come into the possession of the robbers, who have thus become liable to control them. ');"><sup>4</sup></span> IF HE HAD HANDED THEM OVER TO THE CARE OF A SHEPHERD, THE SHEPHERD WOULD HAVE ENTERED [INTO ALL RESPONSIBILITIES] INSTEAD OF HIM. IF A SHEEP [ACCIDENTALLY] FELL INTO A GARDEN AND DERIVED BENEFIT [FROM THE FRUIT THERE], PAYMENT WOULD HAVE TO BE MADE TO THE EXTENT OF THE BENEFIT,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But not to the extent of the actual damage: cf. supra 19b. ');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 110:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.