Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 132:5

אמר ליה רבא וליטעמיך הא דתניא (ויקרא טו, ה) משכבו ולא הגזול

Now, what were the circumstances? If we assume before Renunciation, why do I require a text, since this is quite obvious?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That a stolen object could not be brought to the altar. ');"><sup>9</sup></span> Should we therefore not assume after Renunciation, which would show that Renunciation does not transfer ownership?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In contradiction to the view expressed by Rabbah. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 132:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse