Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 132:9
של גנב מחשבה מטמאתן של גזלן אין מחשבה מטמאתן
Abaye objected to R. Joseph's view [from the following]: In the case of skins belonging to a private owner, mere mental determination renders them capable of becoming [ritually] unclean<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As his mental determination is final, and the skins could thus be considered as fully finished articles and thus subject to the law of defilement. (V. Kel. XXVI, 7.) ');"><sup>17</sup></span> whereas in the case of those belonging to a tanner no mental determination<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To use them as they are. ');"><sup>18</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 132:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.