Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 156:22

בעי רבי ירמיה מכרה חוץ משלשים יום חוץ ממלאכתה חוץ מעוברה מהו

he would not have to make four-fold and five-fold payments, whereas the wool of the animal being a part which is usually shorn off could not be reckoned as an reservation, and he would thus have to make four-fold or five-fold payment. But the other Tanna of the School of R. Simeon b. Eleazar maintained that its fore-paws or feet which require slaughter [to render them permissible] form a reservation, and he would not have to pay four-fold and five-fold payments, whereas its horns or its wool, as they do not require slaughter [to render them permissible] would not constitute a reservation. But does R. Simeon b. Eleazar not contradict himself? — Two Tannaim report differently the view of R. Simeon b. Eleazar.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 156:22. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.