Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 157:5

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> גנב ברשות הבעלים וטבח ומכר חוץ מרשותם או שגנב חוץ מרשותם וטבח ומכר ברשותם או שגנב וטבח ומכר חוץ מרשותם משלם תשלומי ארבעה וחמשה אבל גנב וטבח ומכר ברשותם פטור

so also where the slaughter was effected [by some other person authorised by the thief to do so the thief would be liable]. There is also a new point in the concluding clause: <i>'Where he stole it and consecrated it'</i>, which tells us that it makes no difference whether he disposed of it to a private person or whether he disposed of it to the ownership of Heaven.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Provided, however, that he did not consecrate it to be sacrificed as an offering upon the altar, in which case the transfer would not he complete as supra 76a, but where the animal was blemished and he consecrated it to become a permanent asset of the Temple treasury (Tosaf.). ');">⁵</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 157:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.