Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 104:33

ודרוסת הזאב

that the sole purpose of R'Judah's statement was merely to explain [the words of the first Tanna but not to dissent therefrom]! - Do you point out a contradiction between one authority and another!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rab does not agree with the view expressed above in the name of R. Ila'a but holds that R. Judah expressed a dissenting view, the first Tanna being of the opinion that the clawing by a wolf would render trefah even large cattle. Now it might have been inferred from this that the clawing by a cat would render trefah small cattle, e.g., sheep and goats; Rab therefore expressly teaches us that a cat is absolutely excluded, and its clawing is of no consequence.');">¹⁵</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 104:33. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.