Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 237:10

אחרים אומרים

R'Johanan, however, says that it can only be regarded as a handle, and so he is in agreement with the first Tanna.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He cannot however regard the bones in the dispute between the first Tanna and Judah b. Nakosa as protections, for then he would be in agreement with neither: for Judah b. Nakosa insists upon an olive's bulk, and the first Tanna upon a half olive's bulk, since he speaks of two bones together making up an olive's bulk, whereas R. Johanan rules that a protection can serve as such even to anything less than the size of a bean which is certainly less than a half olive's bulk. See Rashi and Tosaf. a.l.');">⁷</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 237:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.