Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 24:22

אין להן מחשבה דתנן

[Presumably] because we have learnt that the law recognizes the act [of a minor as sufficient evidence of his intention]; for the same reason he need not have put the question in regard to the [expression of the] intention of a minor, because we have learnt that the law does not recognize the [expression of the] intention [of a minor as sufficient evidence of his intention]! For we have learnt:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Kel. XVII, 15.');">¹⁰</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 24:22. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.