Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 79:14

ואי אמרת כיון ששחט בה סימן אחד אסרה אשחוטי חוץ לא ליחייב

Although the Rabbis have declared that he who bowed down to his neighbour's beast has not rendered it prohibited, nevertheless if he performed on it an act<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As e.g. by pouring wine between its horns. V. A.Z. 54a.');">⁷</span> [of idolatrous worship], he has thereby rendered it prohibited. R'Nahman raised this objection against R'Huna, [It was taught:] If a person [inadvertently] slaughtered on the Sabbath a sin-offering outside [the Temple Court] as a sacrifice to an idol, he is liable to three sin-offerings.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' (i) For breaking the Sabbath, (ii) for slaughtering a consecrated animal outside the Temple court, and (iii) for slaughtering unto idols.');">⁸</span> Now if you say that as soon as he has cut one organ only he has rendered it prohibited, then he should not be liable on account of slaughtering outside,

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 79:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.