Mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 141:17

ר"ש אומר אחד זה ואחד זה אין צריכין לערב: ואפילו לזה ביין ולזה בשמן אמר רבה הכא במאי עסקינן בחצר שבין שני מבואות ור"ש לטעמיה

Said Raba: A deduction also supports this view. For it was stated: WITH THE ONE IN WINE AND WITH THE OTHER IN OIL, IT IS NECESSARY FOR THEM TO JOIN IN AN 'ERUB; now if you grant that the first clause deals with one container and the final clause with two containers both rulings are quite correct,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the wine spoken of in the first clause was kept in one container no other 'erub was consequently required, while in the case of the wine and the oil spoken of in the final clause, since they were kept in two containers, a special 'erub was rightly required.');">³⁶</span> but if you contend that the first clause deals with two containers and the final clause deals with two containers, why.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 141:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.