Mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 142:6

רב יוסף אמר ר"א בן תדאי ורבנן בסומכין על שיתוף במקום עירוב קמיפלגי

They only differ where the householders bought a cask of wine in partnership.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the individual contributions were never distinguishable from one another.');">¹⁸</span> R'Eleazar B'Taddai is of the opinion that there is no such rule as bererah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. In consequence none of the householders has any distinguishable share in the wine.');">¹⁹</span> while the Rabbis maintain that the rule of bererah holds good.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that every householder may be regarded as having contributed a definite and distinguishable share to the common contents of the cask.');">²⁰</span> R'Joseph explained: R'Eleazar B'Taddai and the Rabbis differ on the question whether it is permissible to rely upon shittuf<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos.');">¹⁵</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 142:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.