Mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 197:19

<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> רישא רבנן וסיפא רבי מאיר

to reverse the statement,for we are dealing here with phlegm.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is detached from the lungs by the time it reaches the mouth.');">³⁵</span> But was it not taught: R'Judah ruled: 'If his phlegm was detached',<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' He must not walk beyond four cubits in the public domain.');">³⁶</span> which implies also, does it not, 'if his spittle was detached'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The text is in disorder. Read (v. D.S.) : 'R. Judah said, (the same applies to) his phlegm or spittle'; now does this not mean if his phlegm or spittle was detached?- No, only if his phlegm was detached (but as to spittle, there is no liability unless he turned it over) ].');">³⁷</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 197:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.