Mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 60:11

ומאי פסקא אלא סומכוס סבר לה כרבנן דאמרי כל דבר שהוא משום שבות גזרו עליו בין השמשות

This rather [is the reply:]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To the question, raised supra, why Symmachus differed only in respect of UNCONSECRATED PRODUCE and not in respect of WINE. ,uca ,ca');">²⁶</span> Symmachus holds the same opinion as the Rabbis who had land down that every kind of Occupation that may be classed as shebuth<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' (rt. 'to rest') an act that is only Rabbinically forbidden to be performed on the Sabbath.');">²⁷</span> has, as a preventive measure,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That one might not perform the same work on the Sabbath when it is forbidden Pentateuchally.');">²⁸</span> been forbidden [on the Sabbath Eve] at twilight.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The setting aside of terumah is such an act. Hence the untenability of the suggestions supra on the methods of converting terumah into unconsecrated produce.');">²⁹</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Eruvin 60:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.