Mesorat%20hashas for Ketubot 62:10

רבינא דייק מרישא רב אחא דייק מסיפא רבינא דייק מרישא היה מושכו ויוצא ומת ברשות בעלים פטור טעמא דמת ברשות בעלים הא הוציאו מרשות בעלים ומת חייב רב אחא דייק מסיפא הגביהו או שהוציאו הוצאה דומיא דהגבהה מה הגבהה דאתי לרשותיה אף הוצאה נמי דאתי לרשותיה

Ravina makes a deduction from the first clause, and R. Aha makes a deduction from the second clause. Ravina makes a deduction from the first clause: “If he was pulling it out and it died in the domain of the owner, he is exempt.” The reason [he is exempt] is because it died in the domain of the owner, but if he had brought it out from the domain of the owner and it died, he would have been obligated [to pay]. Aha makes a deduction from the second clause: “But if he lifted it up or brought it out [etc.]” Bringing out is like lifting up; just as lifting up is [an act through which the object] comes into his possession, so too bringing out [must he an act through which the object] comes into his possession.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Ketubot 62:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.