Mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 100:14

גופא אמר רבה כל שאינו בזה אחר זה אפי' בבת אחת אינו איתיביה אביי

but if kiddushin with her is not valid, is he then liable to kareth?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V, Glos. in fact, he is not married to either, and so may take the sister.');">²⁶</span> But, said Raba, the verse refers to consecutive [marriage],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'this after this'.');">²⁷</span> and our Mishnah is in accordance with Rabbah, who said: That which cannot be [done] consecutively cannot be [done] simultaneously. The text [stated]: 'Rabbah said: That which cannot be [done] consecutively cannot be done simultaneously.' Abaye raised an objection against him:

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 100:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.