Mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 112:13

מתקיף לה מר זוטרא ואימא ה"מ היכא דבדק צור ושחט בה דמיחזי כסקילה אבל שחטיה בסכין לא מידי סכין באורייתא כתיב ועוד תניא בכל שוחטין בין בצור בין בזכוכית בין בקרומית של קנה

- That is only where the prohibition of food is derived from, it shall not be eaten;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Then R. Abbahu's exegesis shews that 'eating' includes all benefit.');">²⁴</span> but here the prohibition of eating follows from, 'it shalt surely be stoned': for should you think that it is written to intimate prohibition of benefit, Scripture should state, 'and he shall not benefit',<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When both eating and general benefit are to be forbidden, it is reasonable that the former only is mentioned as including the latter. But when only the latter is needed, the former already being known, surely benefit should be expressly stated?');">²⁵</span> or, 'it shall not be eaten': why add, 'its flesh'?

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 112:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.