Mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 69:6

הניחא למ"ד תפילין מ"ע שהזמן גרמא אלא למ"ד תפילין מ"ע שלא הזמן גרמא מאי איכא למימר מאן שמעת ליה דאמר תפילין מ"ע שלא הזמן גרמא ר' מאיר וסבר לה שני כתובים הבאים כאחד וכל שני כתובים הבאים כאחד אין מלמדין

And since women are exempt from affirmative precepts limited to time, it follows that they are subject to those not limited to time.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For otherwise, this comparison should be written in connection with the latter, e.g., study of the Torah, whence I would deduce that woman are exempt from all such precepts (and from precepts limited to time too, a fortiori) .');">¹¹</span> Now, that is well on the view that phylacteries are a positive command limited to time; but what can be said on the view that they are not?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This question is disputed in Shab. 61a.');">¹²</span> - Whom do you know to maintain that phylacteries are an affirmative precept not limited to time?

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 69:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.