Mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 92:11

ותיהוי תרומה ויחזור ויתרום מי לא תנן משאינו נקוב על הנקוב תרומה ויחזור ויתרום הא אוקימנא בתרי מאני צאית בחד מנא לא צאית

Yet let it be terumah [i.e., hallah], but that he [the Israelite] shall make another separation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Without making it necessary for the priest to return it.');">²¹</span> Did we not learn: [If one separates terumah] from an unperforated pot upon [the contents of] a perforated one, it is terumah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the sense that the priest need not return it.');">²²</span> yet he must make another separation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The rule is that both that which is separated as terumah and that for which it is separated must be liable to terumah. Here the former is not, and hence another separation must be made. - The same should apply here.');">²³</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Kiddushin 92:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.