Mesorat%20hashas for Menachot 8:2
תנן כל המנחות שנקמצו שלא לשמן כשירות אלא שלא עלו לבעלים לשום חובה חוץ ממנחת חוטא ומנחת קנאות ואם איתא ליתני נמי חוץ ממנחת העומר
[An objection was raised:] We have learnt: ALL MEAL-OFFERINGS FROM WHICH THE HANDFUL WAS TAKEN UNDER ANY OTHER NAME THAN THEIR OWN ARE VALID, SAVE THAT THEY DO NOT DISCHARGE THE OBLIGATION OF THE OWNER, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SINNER'S MEAL-OFFERING AND THE MEAL-OFFERING OF JEALOUSY. Now if the [above ruling of Rab] were correct, then it should have also stated 'with the exception of the meal-offering of the 'Omer'! - It only states those [meal-offerings] which are brought by an individual and not that which is brought by the whole community;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As is the case with the meal-offering of the 'Omer; v. Lev. XXIII, 12.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Menachot 8:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.