Mesorat%20hashas for Niddah 144:13

משכב ומושב דשכיח מטמיא ליה בועל דלא שכיח לא מטמיא

We learnt, IF SHE PERFORMED IMMERSION ON THE NEXT DAY AND THEN HAD INTERCOURSE, SUCH AN ACT IS IMPROPER CONDUCT, BUT THE UNCLEANNESS OF THEIR TOUCH AND THEIR LIABILITY TO A SACRIFICE ON ACCOUNT OF THEIR INTERCOURSE ARE IN SUSPENSE. Does not this represent the general view?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even that of Beth Shammai who accordingly hold that on the day following a discharge during the intermediate days of the zibah period the woman's touch causes only a suspended uncleanness. An objection thus arises against R. Huna who maintained that according to Beth Shammai couch and seat in such circumstances are held to be unclean. ');">¹²</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Niddah 144:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.