Mesorat%20hashas for Pesachim 124:2

רישא בטומאת בשר סיפא בטומאת גברי אין שם טומאה קפריך

Thus the first clause refers to uncleanness of flesh, while the second clause refers to the uncleanness of the person? - Yes: he argues from the designation of uncleanness. Alternatively, the whole refers to uncleanness of the flesh; and [as to the question,] where was it permitted? [It was] in [the case of] the uncleanness of the Paschal lamb.

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Pesachim 124:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.