Mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 162:10

והתם מלקות ליכא במאי קמיפלגי אמר רבינא בכיפה צריכה התראה קמיפלגי

Now presumably, both agree that flagellation affords a basis for presumption, and they differ on the lines of Rabbi and R. Simeon b. Gamaliel?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first Tanna agreeing with Rabbi that twice affords presumption, Abba Saul with R. Simeon b. Gamaliel. But since the first Tanna is identical with the Tanna of our Mishnah, it follows that it cannot agree with R. Simeon b. Gamaliel. This refutes Rabina. ');">⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 162:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.