Mesorat%20hashas for Shabbat 103:12

ת"ש כי אתא רב שמואל בר יהודה א"ר חנינא מולאות של בית רבי יוצאות באפסריהן כרוכים בשבת

And what [reason] do you see to delete the latter on account of the former? Delete the former on account of the latter! — Because we find that it was Samuel who ruled: As an ornament it is forbidden; as a guard it is permitted. [For it was stated:]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Other edd. omit the bracketed passage, and substitute: What is our decision on the matter? — It was stated: ');">¹¹</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Shabbat 103:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.