Mesorat%20hashas for Shevuot 73:1

להו הזיד בשבועת הפקדון והתרו בו מהו כיון דחידוש הוא דבכל התורה לא אשכחן מזיד דמייתי קרבן והכא מייתי קרבן לא שנא אתרו ביה ולא שנא לא אתרו ביה או דלמא ה"מ היכא דלא אתרו ביה אבל היכא דאתרו ביה מילקא לקי קרבן לא מייתי או דלמא הא והא עבדינא

to them: If he wilfully transgressed the oath of deposit, and [witnesses] warned him, what is the ruling?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Does he bring an offering; or is he punished by stripes; or both?');">¹</span> Since it presents an anomaly in that in the whole Torah we do not find that a wilful transgressor brings an offering, and here he brings an offering;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Rashi and Tosaf. point out that it is not exactly an anomaly as there are other instances, a Nazirite who wilfully makes himself unclean, where an offering is brought far a wilful transgression, being one of them.]');">²</span> there is therefore no difference whether he is warned or not warned;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And even if warned he brings all offering, but does not suffer stripes.');">³</span> or, it applies only when he is not warned; but when he is warned, he receives stripes, and does not bring an offering; or, do we impose both [punishments] on him? - They said to him: We have it stated [in a Baraitha]: The oath of deposit is more severe than it;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The oath of testimony.');">⁴</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Shevuot 73:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.