Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 155:14

כי אתא רב דימי אמר רבי יוחנן מצרי שני שנשא מצרית ראשונה בנה שני הואי אלמא בתר אימיה שדינן ליה

When R. Dimi came<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From Palestine to Babylon. ');">⁴⁶</span> he stated in the name of R. Johanan: If an Egyptian of the second generation married an Egyptian wife of the first generation. her son is [regarded as belonging to the] second generation. From this it is obvious that a child is ascribed to his mother. Said Abaye to him: What then of the following statement of R. Johanan. 'If a man set aside a pregnant beast as a sin-offering and it then gave birth, his atonement may be made, if he desires, with the beast itself, and, if he prefers, his atonement may be made with her young'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tem. 25a. ');">⁴⁷</span> This law would be intelligible if you admit that an embryo is not regarded as a part<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'thigh'. ');">⁴⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 155:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.