Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 167:11
אין לה לא כתובה ולא פירות ולא מזונות ולא בלאות והולד כשר וכופין אותו להוציא
A WOMAN WHO IS WITHIN THE SECOND GRADE OF KINSHIP TO THE HUSBAND BUT NOT WITHIN THE SECOND GRADE OF KINSHIP TO THE LEVIR,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If, for instance, the woman was the husband's mother's mother and the levir was his paternal, but not his maternal brother. ');"><sup>21</sup></span> IS FORBIDDEN TO THE HUSBAND AND PERMITTED TO THE LEVIR; [A WOMAN WHO IS WITHIN] THE SECOND GRADE OF KINSHIP TO THE LEVIR BUT NOT WITHIN THE SECOND GRADE OF KINSHIP TO THE HUSBAND IS FORBIDDEN TO THE LEVIR AND PERMITTED TO THE HUSBAND; [WHILE ONE WHO IS WITHIN] THE SECOND GRADE OF KINSHIP TO THE ONE AND TO THE OTHER IS FORBIDDEN TO THE ONE AS WELL AS TO THE OTHER. SHE CANNOT CLAIM EITHER <i>KETHUBAH</i>,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' v. Glos. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> OR USUFRUCT,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which the husband had consumed. The reason is given infra 89a. ');"><sup>22</sup></span> OR ALIMONY, OR HER WORN CLOTHES.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which she brought to her husband at their marriage. She has no claim upon such clothes even if they were still available (Rashi). According to Tosaf. (infra 85a, s.v. [H]) she is entitled to such clothes, and the ruling here applies to compensation for clothes which have been completely worn out. Cf Keth. 201a. ');"><sup>23</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 167:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.