Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 225:6

וקטנה מנלן דאית לה כתובה דתנן הממאנת והשנייה ואיילונית אין להן כתובה אבל יוצאה בגט וקטנה יש לה כתובה

Whence, however, is it inferred that a minor is entitled to a <i>kethubah</i>? — From what we learned: A minor who exercised the right of <i>mi'un</i>, a forbidden relative of the second degree,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who is forbidden in Rabbinic, though not in Pentateuchal law. Cf. supra 21a. ');">¹⁵</span> and a woman who is incapable of procreation, are not entitled to a <i>kethubah</i>;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Keth. 100b, B.M. 67a. The first mentioned, because her separation from her husband is effected even against his will; the second was penalized for contracting an unlawful marriage (cf. supra 85b); while in the case of the last the marriage is regarded as a contract under false pretenses. ');">¹⁶</span> but [it follows<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the Mishnah cited speaks only of a minor who has exercised the right of mi'un, and whose separation was, therefore, effected even without the husband's consent. ');">¹⁷</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 225:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.