Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 235:9
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> וצריכא דאי איתמר הך קמייתא בהא קא"ר טרפון משום דצערא דגופה אבל חמותה דצערא מילי דעלמא אימא מודי ליה לרבי עקיבא
IF [THE LATTER] WAS THE DAUGHTER OF AN ISRAELITE [WHO WAS MARRIED] TO A PRIEST, SHE IS PERMITTED TO EAT <i>TERUMAH</i>; SO R. TARFON. R. AKIBA, HOWEVER, SAID.. THIS<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. supra n. 3 mutatis mutandis. ');"><sup>29</sup></span> IS NOT A WAY THAT WOULD LEAD HER OUT OF THE POWER OF TRANSGRESSION, UNLESS [IT BE ENACTED THAT] SHE SHALL BE FORBIDDEN BOTH TO MARRY AGAIN AND TO EAT <i>TERUMAH</i>. <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. And [both statements<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first (relating to a rival) and the second (relating to a mother-in-law). ');"><sup>30</sup></span> were] necessary. For If the first only had been stated, it might have been assumed that only in that did N. Tarfon maintain [his view],<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the evidence of a rival is not accepted. ');"><sup>31</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 235:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.