Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 92:8

דתניא הרי שבא ואמר מלתי ולא טבלתי מטבילין אותו ומה בכך דברי ר' יהודה רבי יוסי אומר אין מטבילין

R. Jose said: He is not to be allowed ablution,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because both circumcision and ablution are required. As the validity of the former is in doubt (v. supra note 1) the latter most nut be allowed unless some act of circumcision (causing a few drops of blood to flow) had again been carried out specifically for the purpose of the initiation. ');">²¹</span> Hence<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since according to R, Akiba one act, either ablution or circumcision, suffices. ');">²²</span> it is permissible for a proselyte<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who had been circumcised on Sabbath Eve in the ritually prescribed manner. ');">²³</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 92:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.