Mesorat%20hashas for Yoma 102:3
יכול לא יביא ואם הביא כשר ת"ל שוב (ויקרא טז, ו) אשר לו שנה הכתוב עליו לעכב
One might have assumed he must [de jure] not bring it from funds beside his own, but that if he [de facto] had done so,it would be valid, therefore Scripture says again: 'which is of himself', repeating the condition in order to render conformity with it indispensable.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XVI, 11 surely indicates that they have no share in the bullock, but receive atonement only by implication through the high priest's atonement, although the bullock is his own private property.');"><sup>3</sup></span> - But according to your own view: If his fellow-priests have no part in it, how can they obtain atonement, [even by implication]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So Bah.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yoma 102:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.