Mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 224:16

ומה בין במת יחיד לבמת ציבור סמיכה ושחיטת צפון

BAMOTH WERE [AGAIN] PERMITTED: MOST HOLY SACRIFICES WERE EATEN WITHIN THE CURTAINS, AND LESSER SACRIFICES [AND SECOND TITHE]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'And second tithe' is a var. lec.');">¹⁸</span> IN ALL THE CITIES OF ISRAEL. WHEN THEY CAME TO JERUSALEM, BAMOTH WERE FORBIDDEN AND WERE NEVER AGAIN PERMITTED,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even after the destruction of the Temple.');">¹⁹</span> AND THAT WAS THE 'INHERITANCE'. MOST HOLY SACRIFICES WERE EATEN WITHIN THE CURTAINS,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the place corresponding to within the curtains of the Tabernacle, viz., in the Temple court.');">²⁰</span> AND LESSER SACRIFICES AND SECOND TITHE WITHIN THE WALL [OF JERUSALEM]. ALL SACRIFICES CONSECRATED WHILE BAMOTH WERE FORBIDDEN AND OFFERED WITHOUT WHILE BAMOTH WERE FORBIDDEN, INVOLVE A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE INJUNCTION,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XVII, 5: even that they may bring them unto the Lord; this is a positive injunction. Deut. XII, 13: Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy burnt-offerings in every place that thou seest; this is the negative injunction, and is understood to apply to all sacrifices.');">²¹</span> AND ONE IS LIABLE TO KARETH ON THEIR ACCOUNT.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XVII, 4: And hath not brought it unto the door of the tent of meeting . . that man shall be cut off among his people.');">²²</span> IF ONE CONSECRATED THEM WHILE BAMOTH WERE PERMITTED, BUT OFFERED THEM WITHOUT WHEN BAMOTH WERE FORBIDDEN, THEY INVOLVE A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE INJUNCTION, BUT ONE IS NOT LIABLE TO KARETH ON THEIR ACCOUNT.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 106b.');">²³</span> IF ONE CONSECRATED THEM WHEN BAMOTH WERE FORBIDDEN, AND OFFERED THEM WHEN BAMOTH WERE PERMITTED, THEY INVOLVE A POSITIVE INJUNCTION,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Having consecrated them when bamoth were forbidden, he was subject to the positive injunction, 'even that they may bring them unto the Lord', which means to the Tabernacle. By waiting until the Tabernacle was destroyed, which rendered this impossible, he transgressed that injunction.');">²⁴</span> BUT THEY DO NOT INVOLVE A NEGATIVE INJUNCTION. THE FOLLOWING SACRIFICES WERE OFFERED IN THE TABERNACLE:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When it was at Gilgal, when bamoth too were permitted.');">²⁵</span> SACRIFICES CONSECRATED FOR THE TABERNACLE: PUBLIC SACRIFICES WERE OFFERED IN THE TABERNACLE, AND PRIVATE SACRIFICES WERE OFFERED AT A BAMAH.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If animals were consecrated for public or private sacrifices, and the place was unspecified, it is tacitly assumed that the former were meant for sacrifice in the Tabernacle (public sacrifices could be sacrificed only there) , and the latter were meant for bamoth.');">²⁶</span> IF PRIVATE SACRIFICES WERE CONSECRATED FOR THE TABERNACLE, THEY MUST BE OFFERED IN THE TABERNACLE; YET IF ONE OFFERED THEM AT A BAMAH, HE IS NOT LIABLE. WHEREIN DID THE MINOR BAMAH AND THE GREAT BAMAH DIFFER? [IN RESPECT OF] LAYING [OF HANDS]. SLAUGHTERING IN THE NORTH,

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 224:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.