Musar for Yevamot 48:10

אמר רב ששת אמינא כי ניים ושכיב רב אמר להאי שמעתתא דתניא הנטען על אשת איש והוציאוה על ידו ונתגרשה מתחת ידי אחר אם כנס לא יוציא

need not part with her once he has married her'. Now, how is this to be understood? If it is a case where witnesses<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra note 3. ');">³⁵</span> are available, of what avail is it that another man stepped in and checked the rumour?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By his marriage. The testimony of the witnesses surely caused her to be permanently prohibited to the paramour. ');">³⁶</span> [Must we] not then [conclude that this is a case] where there were no witnesses;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra note 3. ');">³⁵</span> and the reason<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Why the paramour need not divorce her once he has married her. ');">³⁷</span>

Explore musar for Yevamot 48:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.