Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 51:22

<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> אדם מועד לעולם בין שוגג בין מזיד בין ער בין ישן סימא את עין חבירו ושיבר את הכלים משלם נזק שלם:

his reasoning could easily be refuted. For what analogy could be drawn to damage done by Foot for which there is liability in the case of Foot [whereas this is not the case with ransom]? Does this [by itself] not show that the inference could only have been made from ransom in the case of Foot,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V, supra p. 134, n. 10. ');">³⁶</span> proving thus that ransom has to be paid for [manslaughter conmitted by] Foot? — It certainly does show this.

Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 51:22. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.