Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 56:9

ולטעמיך תיקשי לך היא גופא (קשיא) רישא פטור וסיפא חייב

— Rab [however, maintains<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The difference in principle between Samuel and Rab is that the former maintains that nuisances of all kinds, whether abandoned by their owners or not, are subject to the law applicable to Pit, in which case there is no liability either for damage done to inanimate objects or death caused to human beings, whereas the view of Rab is that only abandoned nuisances are subject to these laws of Pit, but nuisances that have not been abandoned by their owners are still his chattels, and as such have to be subject to the law applicable to ox doing damage, in which case no discrimination is made as to the nature of the damaged objects, be they men, beasts or inanimate articles; cf. also supra p. 38. ');">⁷</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 56:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.